X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D596749.7000708@acm.org> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:32:57 -0800 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: svn References: <4D540927 DOT 9030000 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <83vd0rmzd6 DOT fsf AT garydjones DOT name> <4D54506B DOT 7080702 AT acm DOT org> <4D5563A9 DOT 60607 AT acm DOT org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/14/2011 12:11 AM, Gary wrote: > David Rothenberger wrote: >> If the files checked out in both directories are byte-for-byte identical >> (including binary files), I can't see how svn could be the culprit. > > If I can replace svn in the sequence with something else, for example > tortoise, and everything then works, then Cygwin/svn *is* the culprit. If the bits are identical, then what else could be breaking your build? Perhaps the permissions on files, as I suggested in the same email you partially quoted above? I'm sorry, but I don't have anything else to offer here. You'll have to do some more investigation on your own about why the build is failing with the code checked out from Cygwin's svn. -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth AT acm DOT org Volunteer Cygwin Subversion maintainer. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple