X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,TW_KC,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <COL101-W496C2AAD8F993F427FAFDDE6100@phx.gbl>
From: Jay K <jay DOT krell AT cornell DOT edu>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: RE: upper limit to df reported available size?
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 01:51:00 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1292030585.3028.ezmlm@cygwin.com>
References: <1292030585 DOT 3028 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


 >  I guess what we really need
 > is to redefine fsblkcnt_t to become a 64 bit type. Oh well, this
 > requires another backward compatibility hack, just like back when we
 > switched to 64 bit off_t (Cygwin 1.5). Let's do it at the same time as
 > we change sigset_t and time_t to 64-bits(with knock-on effects to
 > struct stat, among others). In other words,all good changes, but certain=
ly
 > something that will take a lot ofplanning to pull off in one go.
=20
=20
Can you fix the jmp_buf size then too maybe?
It is blown up by a factor of 4.
http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2009-01/msg00863.html
=20
I realize it has less/no value to fixing.
But I'm not sure how changing the others won't require *everything*
(just about) to be recompiled anyway. Maybe you rename functions somehow?
=20
=20
Thanks,
 - Jay

=20=20=09=09=20=09=20=20=20=09=09=20=20

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple