X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <892554.5718.qm@web25507.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:54:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Marco Atzeri Subject: Re: Cygwin paths in mingw64 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, NightStrike Cc: LionAM In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --- Ven 5/11/10, NightStrike ha scritto: > > and Atlas is so deep unix related, that is better to > use >=20 > Does this imply that a direct mingw port is not feasible > without > extensive effort? >=20 eventually with the mingw make but unlikely with the cygwin one. Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple