X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4CBDF9C4.7010007@sidefx.com>
References: <AANLkTi=HnoWTpZ5+_VZ56cZADJe+qxbc9seQmzAwENN9 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4CBDF9C4 DOT 7010007 AT sidefx DOT com>
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit DOT haase AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:50:31 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimgeYp3hrSO97OFvdmA61FbmUb=et3XBcP6ramM@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Win7 64bit, why so slow?
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 19 October 2010 22:04, Edward Lam <edward AT sidefx DOT com> wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 3:30 PM, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>
>> I don't get it. =A0What is the problem? =A0What can I do? =A0Where to lo=
ok
>> first? How to fix this disagreeableness?
>
> This is probably the same problem as tracked down previously:
> =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-08/msg00964.html


Can this dll_crt thing, can this be really the single cause of all
evil?  Why does it affect x64 more and x86 systems not so much?  Where
is the logic?


> This is the last I heard about it:
> =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-09/msg00796.html

Oh my ;)


> Also, you might also be running into this problem:
> =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-05/msg00190.html

No bash completion here:
$ time bash -i -c echo

real    0m0.312s
user    0m0.015s
sys     0m0.076s

And this wouldn't cause sh, m4 or perl scripts to run that slow like
here, like all the autotools are incredible slow for me.

bash is noticeable slower with completion activated, this I can confirm:
$ time bash -i -c echo

real    0m1.731s
user    0m0.325s
sys     0m0.699s


Gerrit

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple