X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BOTNET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:43:32 -0400 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: rebaseall failures, propsal Message-id: <20101008134332.GA3324@tishler.net> Mail-followup-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4CADC267 DOT 1080306 AT gmx DOT de> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <4CADC267.1080306@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:51:51PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Jason, could you possibly make sure that rebase (or rebaseall) makes > all files to be rebased writeable? Yes. > perlrebase does just that: > > cat rebase$suff.lst | xargs chmod u+w > rebase -v -b $baseaddr -T rebase$suff.lst > cat rebase$suff.lst | xargs chmod u-w > > ...which might work more or less the same for rebaseall. However, IMO, having rebaseall change the permissions of files seems wrong. Nevertheless, if the consensus agrees with the above proposal, then I will change rebaseall accordingly. Opinions? Thanks, Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple