X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_XD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4CAEEDFE.9090907@towo.net> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:10:06 +0200 From: Thomas Wolff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: How to know if the x11 display uses 24-bit RGB color or instead uses a color palette with a fixed number of colors References: <20101008022744 DOT 76266 DOT qmail AT web3309 DOT mail DOT ogk DOT yahoo DOT co DOT jp> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Am 08.10.2010 04:50, schrieb Mark Geisert: > Tatsuro MATSUOKA writes: >> On the Linux, the xdpyinfo command can be used. On my cygwin system, xdpyinfo > does not exist. However >> I do not install full components of the cygwin. >> >> Does the "xdpyinfo" exist in cygwin? > For a while now the X components have been unbundled and can be installed > separately, mostly. I wonder why they were unbundled. It has been suggested here before that it would be useful to bundle the typical tiny X tools with the default X installation, just to avoid such trouble. ------ Thomas -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple