X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <4C84FFE0.7070507@redhat.com> References: <20100812114508 DOT GA14202 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C84FFE0 DOT 7070507 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: Windows Server 2008 64-bit setup.exe/bash problem - Amazon Cloud X-KeepSent: 41CFF871:F60F4E74-862577A4:0050097A; type=4; flags=0; name=$KeepSent To: Paolo Bonzini , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: From: Ernest Mueller Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:41:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-09-20_06:2010-09-20,2010-09-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hey, great find, I'm glad to know that this wasn't all "me being crazy." I'm impressed this went from problem ID to a new test kernel version in 2 months flat. I've pinged Amazon to see if they can get on the track of this too; I suspect they aren't exactly uptaking kernel changes quickly but we'll find out. (Sorry this is a bit delayed, I don't read the list regularly, I come back and search every month to see if anyone's found the problem yet - looks like I hit the jackpot this time!) Ernest > I'm not into Cygwin development enough to know what a BLODA is, but you > may like to know the bug is in the Xen hypervisor used by Amazon. I > don't know exactly what releases or Xen are affected, but for sure all > RHEL5 (and CentOS 5) hypervisors are. > > The reason why you see it only on 64-bit Windows, is that the bug is > about Xen mishandling the SWAPGS instruction which, well, is only > present in 64-bit processors and in 64-bit mode. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613187 > > Paolo > > ps: KVM was also affected until last February. I haven't checked if > RHEL/CentOS KVM has the bug, but I'll ask fellow developers around about it. ______________________ UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple