X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_CG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C8528E2.7060904@graphtech.co.il> Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:46:10 +0300 From: Sagi Ben-Akiva User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin slow on x64 systems References: <4C7B9327 DOT 9030204 AT graphtech DOT co DOT il> <4C7E8A40 DOT 4090102 AT redhat DOT com> <4C84D12A DOT 2080506 AT graphtech DOT co DOT il> <20100906162955 DOT GA10851 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20100906162955.GA10851@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 06/09/2010 19:29, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:31:54PM +0300, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: >> Hi Magnus, >> >> I applied your patch but I don't notice for any improvement in performance with >> my test case (I still get only 7 lines/sec). >> >> I tried it with several cygwin 1.7.7-1 revisions >> Which version of cygwin sources do you use ? >> Did you try it with the latest snapshot ? > > Why are you trying obsolete patches when I've indicated that there is a > fix available in the latest snapshot? > > cgf > Because with the snapshot that you published I still get slow performance. I tried the cygwin1.dll snapshot from 2010-09-01 and from 2010-09-04. Sagi. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple