X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 12:29:55 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin slow on x64 systems Message-ID: <20100906162955.GA10851@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4C7B9327 DOT 9030204 AT graphtech DOT co DOT il> <4C7E8A40 DOT 4090102 AT redhat DOT com> <4C84D12A DOT 2080506 AT graphtech DOT co DOT il> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C84D12A.2080506@graphtech.co.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:31:54PM +0300, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: >Hi Magnus, > >I applied your patch but I don't notice for any improvement in performance with >my test case (I still get only 7 lines/sec). > >I tried it with several cygwin 1.7.7-1 revisions >Which version of cygwin sources do you use ? >Did you try it with the latest snapshot ? Why are you trying obsolete patches when I've indicated that there is a fix available in the latest snapshot? cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple