X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-RZG-AUTH: :L3UDYkmmW/5gvS7m89gzr8vfKmzK2Ft8ydnRhMfYajCTGOJ4GpZ3FWTYNwsDobJ1
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Message-ID: <4C6456E8.4080808@apconsult.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:17:44 +0200
From: DaveLaw <cygwin AT apconsult DOT de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: CygWin Security & Performance Issues
References: <201008121351 DOT o7CDp56h018152 AT post DOT webmailer DOT de> <20100812140244 DOT GH14202 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <7359-1281637768-267998 AT sneakemail DOT com> <20100812191551 DOT GD26062 AT trikaliotis DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <20100812191551.GD26062@trikaliotis.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

  Maybe the co-leader of the project should channel her efforts into 
just that,
rather than getting peoples backs up with unnecessary nitpicking about
how she thinks they should structure their emails.

Best Regards,
DaveLaw

On 12.08.2010 21:15, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
> * On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:29:27PM -0400 Robert Jacobson wrote:
>> On 8/12/2010 10:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen  wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I'll not waste my time and reply to you another time.  That makes
>>> both of us happy.
>> Is this what passes for professional behavior at Red Hat?
> You mean, the co-leader of the project should let herself be insulted
> from a person who got his answers, but did not even give a thank you?
> Note also that this is the "open" Cygwin list. That is, this is not a
> paid support channel. I would consider it more like some people give
> advice for free, and not necessarily with the hat of Red Hat.
>
> I'll go back in lurk mode again...
>
> Regards,
> Spiro.
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple