X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:38:47 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mutt and perl-ming Message-ID: <20100705073847.GE6521@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4C2D051F DOT 90407 AT veritech DOT com> <20100702132213 DOT GA8163 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C2E9DA1 DOT 6060102 AT veritech DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4C2E9DA1.6060102@veritech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jul 2 22:17, Lee D. Rothstein wrote: > On 7/2/2010 9:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Jul 1 17:14, Lee Rothstein wrote: > >>As long as I'm asking questions, why does 'cygcheck' no > >>longer properly list?: > >> > >> Last downloaded files to: ¬î' > >> Last downloaded files from: ¬î' > >Oh, hmm. The latest versions of setup have changed the way > >the information is stored, but cygcheck doesn't yet know that. > >It still looks in the old places. This needs fixing... > > I presume you're saying that the cygcheck problem is caused by the > information being stored in a new locations, but not the mutt and perl-ming > install issues?! Yes, I was just talking about the cygcheck problem. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple