X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C1FD7FD.6010805@tlinx.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:22:05 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: Bug report / Cygwin prob... X-Stationery: 0.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I have two accounts on my client machine. One is me AT workstation, the other is me AT Domain. They are both me and I need to have them be able access each other's files mostly transparently. As a result, in windows, I setup a group (megroup) that contains both me and me! (@workstation/@domain) and set files to be owned by "megroup", *argh, matey!* Cygwin shows them owned by "-1" (in hex) -- not a very useful number! Is it really the case that the windows API returns -1 for the ownership of this file? I made sure that megroup is in the /etc/password file (as copied from its /etc/group entry). So why is cygwin complaining? I noticed that it doesn't like it when I try to 'chown' using 'megroup' either! So wazzup? Does cygwin specifically check for 'megroup's, and invalidate them if they are groups? Why not just acknowledge that they are owned by the SID that they are and display it as such? ARG! megroup is bein attacked by pirates!!! :-) Linda -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple