X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:47:34 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 'cp' utility bug when .exe file exist. Message-ID: <20100609154734.GA18851@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1276042636 DOT 1651 DOT 9 DOT camel AT erebor> <20100609044034 DOT GB9305 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C0F9535 DOT 7010902 AT redhat DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:02:16PM +0100, Julio Costa wrote: >On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 14:20, Eric Blake wrote: >> >> Have you ever encountered a makefile that doesn't consistently use >> $(EXEEXT) everywhere? ??Too many people just expect 'gcc -o foo ...' to >> produce foo, then 'strip foo' to work, without realizing that on cygwin, >> gcc created 'foo.exe' and strip _has_ to have .exe magic. > >That's just one of the several scenarios which would greatly benefit >from a removal of .exe magic. Uh, no. That would BREAK makefiles. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple