X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C0F9535.7010902@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:20:53 -0600 From: Eric Blake User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Mnenhy/0.8.2 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 'cp' utility bug when .exe file exist. References: <1276042636 DOT 1651 DOT 9 DOT camel AT erebor> <20100609044034 DOT GB9305 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1654F57440A8653B8712FBC4" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --------------enig1654F57440A8653B8712FBC4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/09/2010 07:14 AM, Alexander T wrote: [please don't top-post] > Why not just do the exe magic for executing the files only? When > opening, stating, copying, moving etc, you could leave it out. This > seems the most reasonable compromise to me, but there could of course > be cases which I am overseeing, but I wouldn't expect any script to > rely on exe magic when opening a file for editing. Have you ever encountered a makefile that doesn't consistently use $(EXEEXT) everywhere? Too many people just expect 'gcc -o foo ...' to produce foo, then 'strip foo' to work, without realizing that on cygwin, gcc created 'foo.exe' and strip _has_ to have .exe magic. Yet that is exactly the case of executable images being opened for editing. So the question then is whether the magic should be centralized in cygwin1.dll (preferable) or repeatedly patched into every program that needs it (a maintenance nightmare). Perhaps it does make sense to drop .exe suffixes; teaching gcc that -o foo means we really want a suffix-less file, and teaching users that they want to modify PATHEXE to include . if they are working from the windows side of things. But it won't be an overnight switch, and will come with its share of complaints on the list. Meanwhile, we can't get away from .lnk magic, but that produces orders of magnitude less complaints on the list, so I'm not as worried about it. --=20 Eric Blake eblake AT redhat DOT com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig1654F57440A8653B8712FBC4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMD5U6AAoJEKeha0olJ0NqbowIAJ3GXkkoT6QfZqk57uOBHFSg iOuV7k3hhxi8SRFuRWYJkMNEYpKf8yAya7EtBOyhMo2gQdEBgZE5akgqXArUbsar d987f9/z+cb/SVTXC09+sGMhkFZwERGIc6Yy075kLmswhm7sfeBKdjeICRfRYOc5 3L4zlArd+7G092nMOJME73ZbzJrPgL4zuvefZYBwWsp8F/MBic1LRbWyHd7oyLjr 4X/MjDmSfv3mNIm2QFH+2lYu9XdGpDUvUsTkuAn1e1yQw3FBDRAFS3jbDMZBXMn8 zoSrnSQiK53uiAnfZmRG8BMsYRpAlXBRd8/6bRAVm0+aVoFHwjLVssaniXIdKs0= =KYpf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1654F57440A8653B8712FBC4--