X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <04283c099c3e756b9b4ae85306882b11.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org> In-Reply-To: <20100605190055.GB13928@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20100605052429 DOT GA4801 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100605190055 DOT GB13928 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:16:42 -0700 Subject: Re: Cygwin Performance and stat() From: "Christopher Wingert" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > I do think out loud with my "team". You are not on it. Agreed! You would rather spend your time ridiculing any possible solution. This is what lead to my initial reluctance to do any patch for Cygwin software. Good Luck with your inferior product. Chris -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple