X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:17:59 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: scp no longer reports incremental progress Message-ID: <20100401141759.GF18364@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <806a89db1003291509t34fb9e26y84a9c8a212f64a6d AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4BB125E5 DOT 2020203 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20100329221438 DOT GA8111 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100331181715 DOT GB20959 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Apr 1 14:00, Matthias Andree wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote on 2010-03-31: > > >On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:14:39PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:12:53PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>>On 3/29/2010 6:09 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > >>>>I am running the latest Cygwin (1.7.2) and ssh. > >>>> > >>>>I notice that scp (from local to remote host) no longer shows an > >>>>incremental progress bar. It just reports 100% completion > >>>>immediately, then I have to wait until the copy is actually done. > >>> > >>>>Sink: C0644 11015296 dx4wawd.zip > >>>>dx4wawd.zip > >>>> 100% 11MB 10.5MB/s 00:00 > >>> > >>>Hmm...same behavior here. Didn't we see this behavior before, about a > >>>year ago? I think what fixed it back then was some cgf magic in the > >>>socket fhandler innards. > >>> > >>>Uh-oh. One of the changes between 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 was more socket work. > >> > >>Actually, I think it was pipe related. > > > >And, it was. I removed what I thought was an stupid function. As it > >turns out the function was needed but it just wasn't working quite > >right. > > > >Today's snapshot, uploaded a few minutes ago, should fix the problem. > > Euh, 20100331 seems to introduce regressions for me compared to 20100328. > scp now seems broken for me, > > $ scp -vvvvv somefile user AT example DOT org:/tmp/ > Executing: program /usr/bin/ssh host example.org, user user, command > scp -v -t -- /tmp/ > > and often just hangs there, while PuTTY's pscp and interactive ssh > to the same host + login works just fine, and also if I'm using the > 20100328 snapshot. Strange, I'm trying that, too, and it works every time for me. Is your remote box a Cygwin box or some foreign OS? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple