X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:32:14 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7: Concurrency Issue with Shared State Initialization Message-ID: <20100319183214.GB22027@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20100319182756 DOT GA22027 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4BA3C2C8 DOT 4060803 AT cygwin DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA3C2C8.4060803@cygwin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:30:32PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >On 3/19/2010 2:27 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:59:40PM +0100, Schmidt, Oliver wrote: >>>Thanks for your very active support in solving this issue with our far >>>from mainstream scenario! >> >>You're welcome. It really was a pretty serious problem so I'm glad >>that it surfaced and that we were theoretically able to fix it. >> >>>P.S.: I presume the fix will show up in the next Cygwin release. >> >>Nope. It's just for you. No one else is privileged enough to get the >>fix. :-) > >I object! My mother always told me I was special. Doesn't that make me >privileged too? Ok, ok. We'll make it available to you too. But that's it! cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple