X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4BA1BA09.7040104@gmail.com> References: <1268766945 DOT 5263 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <20100317150649 DOT GA29284 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4BA17A9F DOT 2000808 AT monai DOT ca> <4BA1BA09 DOT 7040104 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:16:26 -0400 Message-ID: <18d205ed1003172216p3d3ff258rde6c9b13cb7d4be1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: incomplete/corrupted setup.exe From: Gregg Levine To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Dave Korn <*****************> wrote: > On 18/03/2010 00:58, Steven Monai wrote: > >> As an alternative to setting up SSL on cygwin.com, what about the idea >> of crypto-signing (e.g. with gnupg) every release of setup.exe, and then >> posting the signature alongside the binary? I know I would breathe a >> little easier if I were able to positively verify the authenticity of a >> given setup.exe binary. > > =A0That much is already done, and documented on the front page of cygwin.= com: > read the first sentence under "Installing and Updating Cygwin and its > Packages" heading just beneath the mid-bar, or go straight to > http://cygwin.com/setup.exe.sig > >> The public key would need to be distributed via channels other than just >> cygwin.com, to make it more difficult to spoof. Fortunately, there are a >> number of public PGP/GPG key servers to fill that purpose. > > =A0And we have already uploaded it to them; DSA key ID 676041BA: > > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dvindex&search=3D0xA9A262FF676041= BA > > =A0 =A0cheers, > =A0 =A0 =A0DaveK > > -- Hello! George, I am certainly not the individual behind the list, I am just another user of this most excellent system as you are. That being said, (Oh and thank you Dave for stating that.) would that be enough for your school to stop blacklisting the setup program for Cygwin? I firmly believe that something did happen in the past to frustrate and confuse the people behind you in the school you are working from. That's why they did that, and I agree it makes less sense to me as well. So given that excellent decision on someone's part, can we consider this subject closed, before CGF gets really annoyed? ----- Gregg C Levine gregg DOT drwho8 AT gmail DOT com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple