X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_40
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4B929995.2050409@bonhard.uklinux.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:06:13 +0000
From: Fergus <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin ML <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
CC: Fergus <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
Subject: Re: Redaction request
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Your responses to the redaction request were absolutely clear.
No post-edits.
Then: multiple replacements of <name> by <***>.
Some of us have looked worse idiots than the OP ever did, and basically 
live with it.
Why the change (well, complete reversal) in policy?
It sets a truly crazy precedent with who knows what consequences.
Fergus


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple