X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=vcfA5DRnACoA:10 a=8_Iqpm1JxLTVc855wgIA:9 a=HP_whvzd00sktsc0goLuIwfSZJ4A:4
Message-ID: <4B84CDCC.1060205@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:57:16 -0500
From: Paul McFerrin <pmcferrin AT columbus DOT rr DOT com>
Reply-To: pmcferrin AT columbus DOT rr DOT com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Question about SIGEMT under Cygwin
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

This is a FYI on subject:

Problem appears with httpd V2.0.63 as well as V2.2.2.  I have compiled 
both versions and they both act the same.  Sounds like a generic problem 
with cygwin, an educated guess.  There is some code in connection.c 
which comments the fact that you should define NO_LINGCLOSE for specific 
OS's so I added CYGWIN to the list.  No Change in behavior.

- Paul

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple