X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:50:56 +0100 From: Gary To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: "undefined reference to `_JNI_CreateJavaVM'" Message-ID: <20100218205056.GA2324@mimosa.garydjones.name> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20100218104310 DOT GB3156 AT mimosa DOT garydjones DOT name> <4B7D6F11 DOT 3070204 AT cygwin DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B7D6F11.3070204@cygwin.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:47:13AM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > On 02/18/2010 05:43 AM, Gary wrote: > >I've basically followed along with what is written at > >http://www.inonit.com/cygwin/jni/invocationApi/ (built an import > >library, passed ld the "-L. -ljvm" parameters, and so on). One difference > >is that gcc no longer supports -mno-cygwin, but I'm not convinced that > >is the cause. > > Since the above site isn't cygwin.com, this list really can't support the > process they've outlined. I'm not asking you to. > if you really need '-mno-cygwin', then you're not building for > Cygwin, With or without is irrelevant to me. Since I am using Cygwin tools I am perfectly happy to not have the '-mno-cygwin'. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple