X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4B7C8CCF.1070300@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:41:51 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: AddAccessAllowedAce(, owner) failed: 1337 References: <9A331329F0534CADB99CA090E20A824A AT Elshadai> <4B757347 DOT 8050006 AT cygwin DOT com> <237C0953DAD04B77A03740269852B419 AT Elshadai> <4B75E029 DOT 9020500 AT cygwin DOT com> <86AE606BC4C2493EBE6359C3A52F4E40 AT Elshadai> <4B78CE89 DOT 6060606 AT cygwin DOT com> <4B7AEE63 DOT 6010301 AT cygwin DOT com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 02/16/2010 03:28 PM, Stephen Grant Brown wrote: > Hi Larry, > Thanks for your quick response. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 6:13 AM > Subject: Re: AddAccessAllowedAce(, owner) failed: 1337 > > >> On 02/16/2010 01:20 AM, Stephen Grant Brown wrote: >>> Again no output from the 1.7 cygcheck >>> >>> Is the cygwin1.dll from 1.5 still in memory and being accessed by the >>> cygcheck in 1.7 when I renamed it? >>> >>> Am I correct in saying that I am not getting any output from the >>> cygcheck from 1.7? >>> >>> How do you suggest I run cygcheck? >> >> I'm not sure. 'cygcheck' doesn't require 'cygwin1.dll' to run. It's a >> pure >> Win32 program. If it's not running, that points to something local >> getting >> in it's way. Again, I can only think of BLODA or other type of security >> application/service. Is there anything else you're running that fits this >> description? I also find it odd that 'cygcheck' from 1.5 runs while 1.7 >> doesn't. Perhaps the output (_attached_) from the 1.5 version will >> provide >> some insight if you can't find anything else causing the problem. >> >> -- >> Larry Hall > > I have had symantec running before but I have removed it to the best of > my ability > (I have not reformatted the hard disk and started with a fresh install > of windows.) > > cygcheck from 1.5 produces output. > cygcheck from 1.7 does not. > How does cygcheck determine the location of the cygin installation to > check? It looks in the registry for a pointer to it. It's the same information you get from 'mount'. Does that work? Does 'cygcheck -cd' work? > Can I use the cygcheck from 1.5 to check the installation of 1.7? No, but it will tell you about 1.5. If your 1.7 is truly DOA, it might be good to know if your 1.5 results suggest anything. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple