X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20100215145825.GA15096@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <5460e3331002102240t20248f5en581227dd1d8ae3f0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <5460e3331002140630k60e778c6kb34717b522c1e690 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <5460e3331002150131k2508b9f2vb20483e40e0baad8 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <20100215145825 DOT GA15096 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:15:14 +0100
Message-ID: <5460e3331002151015y17f49b7as788902b14678b065@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 &  	20100210...
From: Christian Joensson <christian DOT joensson AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

2010/2/15 Christopher Faylor:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Christian Joensson wrote:
>>2010/2/14 Christian Joensson:
>>
>>>> 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't...
>>>
>>> FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does
>>> 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk (revision 156700) libffi
>>> testsuite have the same issue with crept in "."
>>
>>neither 20100214 works for libffi testsuite...
>
> Maybe you're missing Corinna's request for a simple test case to
> track this down. =A0We don't anticipate that this will be fixed until
> someone takes the time to narrow this down.

I'm not ignorant, just incompetent in such a complex situation. I
don't like being addressed in a manner as this if you don't mind me
saying so.

I will stop reporting gcc and cygwin results, as I obviously irritated
you, unless I misinterpret your, in my opinion strong statement above.
I don't need such behaviour and I conclude from your statement above
that you don't want my reports either, so that's fine then.

I see now, however, that Corinna seems to have found a bug she
introduced; I'm all happy she did. My incentive for reporting this
issue was for you guys to make an informed decision, of introducing a
regression, or you may call it a bug if you will, not to solve any of
my problems, I have non related to this.

thanks

--=20
Cheers,

/ChJ

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple