X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-id: <4B6C4F3E.5030707@cygwin.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:02:54 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320  Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: what's the problem of my cygwin installation?
References: <1265318819 DOT 7472 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com>  <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 1002051050560 DOT 28071 AT mail3 DOT jubileegroup DOT co DOT uk>  <4B6C348B DOT 1090303 AT gmail DOT com>  <20100205145923 DOT GD28366 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>  <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A208B4298239 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov>  <20100205160317 DOT GJ28366 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-reply-to: <20100205160317.GJ28366@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 02/05/2010 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor sent the following at Friday, February 05, 2010 9:59 AM
>>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 03:08:59PM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> On 05/02/2010 11:58, G.W.  Haywood wrote:
>>>>> It's long seemed to me that there's a case for changing the name of
>>>>> this file.  On the average Windows box it is not unusual to see several
>>>>> files called 'setup.exe' descended from entirely unrelated products.
>>>>
>>>> The Cygwin icon is a bit of a dead giveaway.
>>>
>>> And, how, exactly, would changing the name of setup.exe to something
>>> else cause a DECREASE in traffic?  It seems like the opposite would be
>>> true.  We'd have to set up a new
>>> "cygwin-what-happened-to-setup DOT exe AT cygwin DOT com" list.
>>
>> Actually, for a while I've thought that a name change might be useful.
>>
>> The icon identifies it in the GUI, but not on the command line.
>>
>> I seem to remember having sometimes being blocked from doing something
>> with a file named setup.exe.  I wasn't blocked after I changed the name
>> or find some other way to do whatever I was trying to do with it.
>>
>> (Though maybe it was with a different "setup.exe".)
>
> Your experiences notwithstanding, obviously thousands of people are
> running setup.exe without problem.  Changing the name would throw a
> large group of people into confusion.
>
> We're not going to change the name.  I think the cost outweighs any
> benefit (and I actually don't see any benefit).

I have this strange feeling that I've seen this exact conversation somewhere
before.  Must have been from one of my trips to an alternate reality where
this is discussed regularly...

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple