X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:24:11 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7.1: df -l returns "df: no file systems processed" Message-ID: <20100204152411.GA31111@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <534111 DOT 43379 DOT qm AT web53206 DOT mail DOT re2 DOT yahoo DOT com> <4B6ABDED DOT 609 AT byu DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6ABDED.609@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 05:30:37AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: >According to Ziad Mansouri on 2/3/2010 2:50 PM: >>df -l returns "df: no file systems processed" for v1.7.1. This is with >>a fresh install without any changes, i.e. /etc/fstab is unmodified. >>In contrast, df -l returned useful output in v1.5. Is this a bug? > >I reproduced it, so I'll look into it. It's probably an unintentional >regression. I need to package coreutils 8.4 anyways, when I can spare >the free time. Probably a "Well, duh" but I'd wager that this is a problem in the DLL rather than one in df. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple