X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:11:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Putting a cygwin installation under bzr VCS ? From: Jurgen Defurne To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Dear all, I would like some input, thoughts really, about keeping a central updated repository with a Cygwin installation which can be updated by running bzr. So, currently, I am testing cygwin 1.7 for deployment. However, the deployment needs to be done across 18 computers which are used as build servers. I know how to download the packages and install them using a remote repository, but doing this time and again on these systems is much work without value. Additionally, our configuration needs to be spiced up with extra packages, like Perl packages, mySQL client library and other tools which are not found in the standard Cygwin packages. I have been using bzr already for over a year with other deployed software (mostly compilers) and I really haven't found any problems with it. So, what do you think about putting one standard installation under bzr (Windows) control and then pulling in changes from the different PC's when they are ready for it ? Regards, Jurgen -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple