X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B5BE64A.7080205@cygwin.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:18:50 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Why require ps -W and kill -f References: <057e01ca9ba9$c9d6b430$5d841c90$@com> <55774 DOT 87912 DOT qm AT web25507 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <059001ca9bb8$c5b176b0$51146410$@com> In-Reply-To: <059001ca9bb8$c5b176b0$51146410$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 01/22/2010 06:15 PM, Don Beusee wrote: > I am a unix user that has moved to windows. I want unix commands on windows > that function like their unix counterparts. That is supposed to be one of > cygwin's missions, is it not? Isn't that one of the main reasons people get > cygwin? What's the point of providing these commands otherwise? > > Why the apparent objection to offering the options to the CYGWIN (or some > other) environment variable where users can control the behavior of these > commands globally on their system? If you won't change the default behavior > because of your religious beliefs, fine, but can you at least allow us to > change the default behavior on our systems that does not involve changing > scripts or typing habits? Please? You've been given alternatives that don't require making code changes to Cygwin or any changes in your scripts or typing habits. And you've been ignoring all the very valid arguments against making changes that you suggest. I think it's fair to say that if you're not going to do your homework and process the responses you're getting, then there is no further value to this thread for the rest of us on this list. Please, let's just stop it here. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple