X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:07:11 +0100 From: "Vincent R." To: Eli Friedman Cc: Reini Urban , , Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] cygwin updates (was: dladdr and =?UTF-8?Q?Dl=5Finfo=29?= In-Reply-To: References: <3ab31ceedb33b3519257e07931dbdaf5 AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> <4B4F7C90 DOT 4030509 AT x-ray DOT at> <4B4F82B1 DOT 3080605 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4B4F908D DOT 2060709 AT x-ray DOT at> Message-ID: X-Sender: forumer AT smartmobili DOT com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >>> >>> On 14/01/2010 14:20, Reini Urban wrote: >>>> >>>> I have a working cygwin llvm and llvm-gcc, >>>> but had no time to produce a proper package yet. >>>> Attached are my cygport files and my local config. >>>> No patches were needed. >>>> >>>> But I haven't bothered to build clang yet, >>>> just the Clang llvmc plugin and llvm-gcc, >>>> which I thought is harder to build and gives us more gcc compatibility. >>> >>> Here's what I have so far for llvm/clang 2.6; the .cygport may be >>> missing something, it's been a few weeks since I've looked at it. >> >> On the cygwin mailinglist we came to some required clang patches. >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-01/msg00587.html >> Sorry, untested, as I got unrelated linker errors. > > The change to tools/CIndex/CIndexer.cpp looks fine if it works. The > change to tools/driver/driver.cpp isn't really right; the code really > needs to be refactored. The changes to the non-C++ include paths in > lib/Frontend/InitHeaderSearch.cpp look a bit suspicious, but it's okay > anyway. The change to lib/Headers/stddef.h is completely wrong; what > is it supposed to fix? Still don't understand why cygwin doesn't implement dladdr, it would avoid some ugly ifdef... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple