X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B47DBAE.5000901@monai.ca> References: <4B46A4C3 DOT 2000803 AT cygwin DOT com> <4B47986F DOT 2020609 AT t-online DOT de> <4B47B3FA DOT 1010101 AT cygwin DOT com> <4B47DBAE DOT 5000901 AT monai DOT ca> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:03:01 -0600 Message-ID: <845c0f81001081903p7debc762td008a826c15e98db@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Update problems From: Rance Hall To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Steven Monai wrote: > Not to beat a dead hippo here, but if Cygwin allows in-use files to be > replaced, then what is 'setup.exe' needed for? (Aside from the initial > bootstrap of Cygwin, of course.) Shouldn't it be possible to have proper > package management---like dpkg, apt, rpm, yum, etc---from within Cygwin now? > > Just wondering. > > -SM I thought that this was a Windows limitation/feature where you can not replace in use files. cygwin has to live in the windows environment and is subject to limitations/features like this. But you are right, if Windows did not impose this limit then package management from within cygwin would be possible. because of my chosen uses of cygwin as a client rather than a server, its relatively easy for me to shutdown cygwin and run setup at least monthly -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple