X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: mjD.OBqswBAPbVUxYJaYPvc61jLEnpq8VnBwJGdbEJOPA9xw Message-ID: <4B4372FB.8060707@sbcglobal.net> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:12:27 +0000 From: Greg Chicares User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Missing /bin/sh References: <6AB9A158423D6748AEAAE86DF7E563A60F0752EC46 AT CUPID DOT ad DOT ergogroup DOT no> In-Reply-To: <6AB9A158423D6748AEAAE86DF7E563A60F0752EC46@CUPID.ad.ergogroup.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2010-01-05 16:48Z, Klas Ekeland wrote: > > I had expected that sh or a symlink to a suitable shell came bundled with cygwin? It ought to be there. It would help to see the cygcheck output described here: > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple