X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B38FA46.8000102@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:34:46 -0500 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.7/emacs 23.1 time bug/workaround status? References: <20091228171700 DOT CC4B1141D1C0D AT cedar DOT isis DOT unc DOT edu> In-Reply-To: <20091228171700.CC4B1141D1C0D@cedar.isis.unc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 12/28/2009 12:17 PM, Tom Roche wrote: > summary: A cygwin-1.7/emacs-23.1 time bug and its workaround is known, > but is it being tracked? I'm Cygwin's Emacs maintainer, and I've documented the bug and workaround in /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/emacs.README. I don't think there's any other tracking being done. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple