X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:37:38 +0100 From: Enrico Forestieri To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: open() and named pipes Message-ID: <20091209163738.GA2892@GIOVE> References: <20081126145052 DOT GB16542 AT sirio DOT sssup DOT it> <20081126173849 DOT GA14783 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20091209144340 DOT GA2916 AT GIOVE> <20091209154108 DOT GA3540 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091209154108.GA3540@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:41:09AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:43:41PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >Sorry for the very late reply and thanks for fixing the return code > >from open(). However, this is still not posix compliant as errno is > >set to ENOENT instead of ENXIO. Indeed, the attached test case prints > >"No process is reading from the other end." on both Linux and Solaris > >but nothing on Cygwin. > > The patch below should fix this. I'll check it in as soon as the latest > version of Cygwin is released. That should be imminent. Thanks! I am looking forward to the release. -- Enrico -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple