X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B1AC580.7090406@nc.rr.com> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:41:36 -0500 From: Ed Gaines User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eliot Moss , cygwin Subject: Re: Confusion re: use of rebaseall vs. rebase to relieve BitDefender woes REDUX References: <4B18F846 DOT 60300 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <4B196F53 DOT 6010603 AT nc DOT rr DOT com> <4B198B26 DOT 2030601 AT nc DOT rr DOT com> <4B1992A5 DOT 6000500 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <4B19A995 DOT 7060405 AT nc DOT rr DOT com> <4B19D7CA DOT 2050804 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <4B1AB37B DOT 70003 AT nc DOT rr DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4B1AB37B.70003@nc.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Ed Gaines wrote: > > Any reason I can't run the rebase and peflags commands from with > cmd.exe? Are > they "pure" windows executables, in other words? I can't stand it. In order to answer my own question cited above, I went back and ran a cmd.exe window as administrator, and then tried to run rebase from within it: C:\cygwin>bin\rebase -d -b 0x61000000 -o 0x20000 -v -T dll_so.in > rebase.out ./bin/cyglsa64.dll: fixing bad relocations FixImage (./bin/cyglsa64.dll) failed with last error = 13 Okay, I expected that. It happened last time, too. So I edited the dll_so.in file (with notepad) and removed cyglsa64.dll, and reran the above rebase command. And got a result that I did NOT, expect: C:\cygwin>bin\rebase -d -b 0x61000000 -o 0x20000 -v -T dll_so.in > rebase.out ReBaseImage (./bin/cygwin1.dll) failed with last error = 6 As before, I searched for open cygwin dlls before and after running rebase. I couldn't find any at all. I tried searching for these dlls DURING the rebase, but unfortunately the rebase command completes before the dll search completes. So even though the dll search never found cygwin1.dll, I can't say for sure that cygwin1.dll was NEVER in use during the process. I'm just about ready to concede that, for whatever reason, I can't run cygwin and BitDefender simultaneously on my Win 7 box. Period. -- Ed -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple