X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B199574.5020508@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:04:20 -0500 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] getgroups regression? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 12/4/2009 5:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On further review, I found my 1.7 /etc/group was more than twice the size of > the 1.5 version; and all of that bulk came from duplicated entries. [...] > But that still makes me wonder - is there anything we are doing in a typical > install that might be accidentally inserting duplicate entries into /etc/group, > or is this something I managed to fubar all by myself way back when I first > created my side-by-side 1.5/1.7 installation (back before the transition was as > smooth as it is now)? I also have duplicate entries in /etc/group in a 1.7 installation that I created last February. But I have a more recent installation with no duplicate entries. So whatever might have been wrong seems to have been fixed. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple