X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20091121212239.GD29173@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20091119094439 DOT GC29173 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20091120093210 DOT GQ29173 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20091121110204 DOT GB23273 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20091121212239 DOT GD29173 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:33:14 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [1.7] Updated: cygwin-1.7.0-65 From: Huang Bambo To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com And there's another quesiton: The handle of chile process( created by fork ) seems never been closed bye parent process. Is it need to be closed? 2009/11/22 Corinna Vinschen : > On Nov 21 23:43, Huang Bambo wrote: >> $ gcc-3 -mno-cygwin -g -o dup-sock dup-sock.c -lws2_32 -lntdll >> >> and output are: >> $ ./dup-sock.exe >> Inherit: 1 >> dwServiceFlags1: 00020066 >> dwServiceFlags2: 00000000 >> dwServiceFlags3: 00000000 >> dwServiceFlags4: 00000000 >> dwProviderFlags: 00000008 >> ProviderId: E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192 >> dwCatalogEntryId: 000003E9 >> ProtocolChain: [len: 1] >> =A0 =A0 0: 0000AB8B >> iVersion: 2 >> iAddressFamily: 2 >> iMaxSockAddr: 16 >> iMinSockAddr: 16 >> iSocketType: 1 >> iProtocol: 6 >> iProtocolMaxOffset: 0 >> iNetworkByteOrder: 0 >> iSecurityScheme: 0 >> dwMessageSize: 0 >> dwProviderReserved: 1912 >> szProtocol: MSAFD Tcpip [TCP/IP] >> ProviderPath: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll >> >> I don't have any antivirus software or firewall installed in my computer. > > The above shows that as well. =A0It's the expected output if no socket > provider is installed which handles this type of socket. > >> Please send the test code to me. > > Nver mind. =A0With the help of your testcase I found the problem. =A0I'll > apply a fix shortly, but I have to think about it some more first. > > > Thanks for the testcase, > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Please, send mails re= garding Cygwin to > Cygwin Project Co-Leader =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat > > -- > Problem reports: =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: =A0 =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple