X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-IronPortListener: Outbound_SMTP From: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]" To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:12:10 -0500 Subject: RE: How to capture stderr of dos process running in bash shell?? Message-ID: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A2088722D749@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> References: <26341304 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <20091113184304 DOT GA18822 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20091113184304.GA18822@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor sent the following at Friday, November 13, 2009 1:43 PM >On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:39:41AM -0800, aputerguy wrote: >>I am trying to capture the error messages of 'subinacl.exe' (a dos >>program included with Windows 2003 toolkit) which I am running from a bas= h script. >> >>However both the stderr and stdout of the process seem to go to bash >>stdout since redirecting bash stderr (2>) doesn't seem to have any effect. >> >>I assume this is because the dos process is running in a bash shell. > >More likely it is writing to the console directly, rather like writing >to "/dev/tty" on UNIX. See also the Cygwin User's Guide: http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-effectively.html#id322908 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple