X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:19:13 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: find Performance extremly slow Message-ID: <20091110201912.GA12730@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20091110150459 DOT GE4616 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20091110200930 DOT GN3918 AT trikaliotis DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091110200930.GN3918@trikaliotis.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:09:30PM +0100, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: >* On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:04:59AM -0500 Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> I knew we shouldn't have put all of those "sleep(5)"s in find.exe... > >You mean, something like a speedup loop? > > http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/The-Speedup-Loop.aspx Yep, exactly. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple