X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:09:30 +0100 From: Spiro Trikaliotis To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20091110200930.GN3918@trikaliotis.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20091110150459 DOT GE4616 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091110150459.GE4616@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 87.163.229.212 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: an-cygwin AT spiro DOT trikaliotis DOT net Subject: Re: find Performance extremly slow X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.trikaliotis.net) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com * On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:04:59AM -0500 Christopher Faylor wrote: > I knew we shouldn't have put all of those "sleep(5)"s in find.exe... You mean, something like a speedup loop? http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/The-Speedup-Loop.aspx SCNR, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple