X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:14:38 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Differences between 'ls' permissions *nix vs cygwin Message-ID: <20091110091438.GT26344@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <26280017 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26280017.post@talk.nabble.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Nov 10 00:44, aputerguy wrote: > I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature. It's Windows. > But I find the following differences between *nix and cygwin on access > permissions of 'ls' > > Test case: > > $ mkdir -p dir1/dir2 > $ chmod 700 dir1 > > > > $ ls -d dir1 > dir1 [both Linux & Cygwin] > > $ ls dir1 > ls: cannot open directory dir1 Permission denied [both Linux & Cygwin] > > $ ls -d dir1/dir2 > ls: cannot access directory dir1/dir2 Permission denied [Linux] > dir1/dir2 [Cygwin] > > No acl's beyond the standard ugo posix permissions are set on either system. > The Cygwin user only belongs to the 'None' and 'Users' group. > > In particular, why is a non-privileged Cygwin user able to look over a > blocked directory further into a file tree? http://www.google.com/search?q=%22bypass%20traverse%20checking%22 Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple