X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <26272231.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:27:41 -0800 (PST) From: aputerguy To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Finding junction points in cygwin In-Reply-To: <26272067.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <26260606 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <416096c60911082351l7e3415e2s28f10549f3cf4136 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20091109120333 DOT GF26344 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <26269606 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <20091109171803 DOT GK26344 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <26270509 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <20091109180913 DOT GA14129 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <26272067 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I have been googling on junction.exe and mklink. Since they both create reparse points, in what way are the reparse points different to the extent that cygwin recognizes those from mklink but not those form junction.exe. The nice thing though about junction.exe is that it uses the *nix like '-d' flag rather than the dos-like '/D' flag that mklink seems to use. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Finding-junction-points-in-cygwin-tp26260606p26272231.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple