X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4ABA99A9.6080103@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:56:57 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: sftp on a Windows 2003 server References: <32517 DOT 57262 DOT qm AT web33505 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> <4ABA9468 DOT 6060408 AT cygwin DOT com> <32405 DOT 5122 DOT qm AT web33504 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> In-Reply-To: <32405.5122.qm@web33504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 09/23/2009 05:44 PM, Dave M wrote: > Larry, > OK, I checked my web mail and I don't see that option. Yeah, that's a common oversight for web email clients... > I am not sure > which e-mail addresses are a problem. One looks like an invalid address > (yours) and the other is the list address. In general, any headers from the previous email don't need to be included and are generally discouraged. That eliminates allot. Some email clients, like Thunderbird, which I use, adds an intro (see above) with a reference to your previous posting. Some of them will add email addresses here too. That's usually the one that slips through the most. As a note, removing the address (i.e. @foo.bar) is all that's required. The name or id is fine to leave. You're correct that my email address is not pointing to me. It's there to prod anyone replying to reply to the list. So, fortunately, I won't be seeing more spam as a result. The list's address is valid, as you know, though. So it's good manners to remove this as well as any individual's. > Either way, I'll delete them > manually from now on. It wasn't my intention to make anyone's life > harder. I am new to this list, so I am not sure what I should or > shouldn't be doing. I really am sorry, I originally thought that maybe > there was an e-mail address in your sig. I double-checked THAt before > replying. Actually, we draw the line there. If there's an email address in the sig, then we assume that the poster doesn't care that the address may be harvested. In that case, it's also not too important to pull the same address out of other spots in the reply. ;-) > I feel like an idiot. I always thought I wasn't, but here I am... It happens. Don't worry about it. If it makes you feel better, you're not the first one to not recognize this. > I have completely removed cygwin again and rebooted this server. I > am just about to re-install, any suggestions on packages that I need > besides openssh? If 'openssh' is what you want, that's all you need to install (plus whatever installs by default). -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple