X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4AAE52A1.6000409@alice.it> References: <4AAE52A1 DOT 6000409 AT alice DOT it> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:00:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reading what should not! From: "Mark J. Reed" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > I do not have Fedora but Kubuntu (8.04 and 9.04). On Kubuntu the user > created in the installation step, say 'pippo', is also 'root' in the sense > that 'pippo' needs 'sudo' (or 'sudo su') for administrative usage. OK, then, big difference. 'pippo' is not root, pippo is able to do things as root when needed. Administrative users on Windows are treated as equivalent to root by Cygwin. If you're saying that admin users should have to use sudo or equivalent to gain elevated access in Cygwin, then that's a feature request. Does it match what Windows does? Outside of UAC in Vista I'm unaware of Administrators having to do anything to activate their privileges. -- Mark J. Reed -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple