X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:33:16 +0200 From: Thomas Plank To: cygwin Subject: Re: [RFU 1.5 and 1.7] subversion-1.6.5-1 and -2 In-Reply-To: <4AA66AD3.5020401@acm.org> References: <750902cbf527b38d6d740f2e6f8b18c6 AT tp DOT myfqdn DOT de> <4AA66AD3 DOT 5020401 AT acm DOT org> Message-ID: Lines: 29 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com David Rothenberger (daveroth AT acm DOT org) wrote: [subversion] >> For me it seems that you have compiled it on your own. >> Did it work for you out of the box? > I apply about 13 patches to the upstream sources to create the package > for Cygwin. Horrible! What a pitty, 1.5.6 worked without any patches ... > My first hint is to use the binary packages I provide for Cygwin instead > of compiling it yourself. Done. Thanks for providing! > If you want to > compile it yourself, I suggest downloading the source package I provide > and following the directions in > /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/subversion*.README. The source package also has > all the patches I apply if you're only interested in that. I don't feel like doing that work for now. By the way: is it Cygwins's fault or have they (subversion's programmers) changed so much in relation to socket.h (?winsock2.h?)? Thanks for the reply, Thomas -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple