X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:58:41 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cron jobs visible Message-ID: <20090810195841.GA8165@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20090810113424 DOT GL3204 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090810143854 DOT GQ3204 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090810164444 DOT GW3204 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A806CE4 DOT 2000408 AT cygwin DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A806CE4.2000408@cygwin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:54:28PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >On 08/10/2009 12:44 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > >> And there's no way back after an update. But as I noted in my zillion >> (apparently unread) test announcements, it's no problem to run 1.5 and >> 1.7 installations in separate directories side-by-side. > >I don't know about anyone else, but I plan to run 1.5 and 1.7 together. >That will give me, effectively, Cygwin 3.2, which I can't wait to try >out! At least I think that's what Corinna's announcements said... ;-) Good point but I think Corinna's announcement said something about formatting my hard drive so I'm not even going to think about installing Cygwin 7.1 until I get a new computer. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple