X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A7B0B7C.2020608@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:57:32 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cl.exe and a C1083 error References: <4A7A5832 DOT 4090108 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 08/06/2009 12:45 PM, Jake wrote: > Yes, we are using the cygwin make. Our builds all normally happen on unix and > using cygwin works better than wine. On the machines it works on it's sending > stuff like: > > cl.exe /I/usr/local/build/release/include > > On my system cl.exe doesn't even pick up the /I with directories like this, on > the build machine it works correctly. I was hoping there was some setting to > allow windows apps to use the posix path in cygwin. Cygwin can't magically add POSIX semantics to Windows programs, so what's being done on the build systems is outside the realm of Cygwin and, as such, would be generally off-topic for this list. However, if I were to hazard a guess, I would surmise that the build machines have the path you indicate at the root of the drive they run the build from (C: perhaps?). You might want to check that. > Is there a way to dump all the settings from cygwin so that I may diff the > results between the machines? Perhaps 'cygcheck -srv' will help if you need to compare Cygwin installations for some other reason? -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple