X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A795C5F.1080709@gmail.com> References: <4A78954D DOT 5080508 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <4A78A3B2 DOT 5080808 AT gmail DOT com> <4A78ADA5 DOT 4060402 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <4A78D72A DOT 6050400 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <4A795C5F DOT 1080709 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:51:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Minor diff: /bin/ksh.exe From: "Mark J. Reed" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > Paul McFerrin wrote: >> I believe this is a non-problem. > =C2=A0This is a 1.7-vs-1.5 difference in the underlying Cygwin DLL then, = and not > related to ksh; yes? What part of "non-problem" do you not understand, Dave? ;) Seriously, is it a difference at all? I thought wildcard matches were always case-sensitive in 1.5 too. --=20 Mark J. Reed -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple