X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Stephan Mueller To: Dave Korn , "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: RE: running MS link.exe under Cygwin sshd? Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:46:43 +0000 Deferred-Delivery: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:47:00 +0000 Message-ID: <450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D42ED97@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> References: <4A73DD05 DOT 9050404 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4A73DD05.9050404@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com " Why VS feels the need to put the PDB access in a separate process under " separate access rights is very puzzling, but there it is. I _believe_ it's a separate process to facilitate writing to a single pdb f= rom multiple simultaneous compiles. Dunno about the separate access rights. stephan(); -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple