X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A5B690A.807@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:04:10 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc4: -ffast-math causes segfaults References: <4A5A9D1E DOT 8040905 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4A5AEEDC DOT 4050308 AT gmail DOT com> <4A5AFD6A DOT 6030407 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4A5AFD6A.6030407@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 13/07/2009 04:24, Dave Korn wrote: >> Yes. -ffaast-math allows the compiler to generate SSE instructions. This >> is a problem if used with plain uninitialised C common variable declarations, >> because the PE file format doesn't have a way to specify the alignment of >> common section allocations. > > BTW, all this is PR37216: Reading that PR just made my head spin. I'm sure glad we've got guys like you on top of this stuff. :-) > Fixing this required adding support to both binutils and GCC; the new > release of binutils includes this support, and both GCC HEAD and the > coming-real-soon-now gcc-4.3.3-1 contain code to make use of the new > ability. Well, that's certainly reassuring. Thanks for the clarification. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple