X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A55ECD8.4060001@sidefx.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:12:56 -0400 From: Edward Lam User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] New package: dash-0.5.5.1-1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eric Blake wrote: > So for now, there are no plans of replacing /bin/sh with dash. Incidentally, I copy ash.exe over to sh.exe every time for performance. AFAICT, /bin/sh defaulted to bash (from ash) back in the bash 3.0 series to be more "similar to Linux distributions". It took me quite some head scratching at the time to determine why my "make clean" would take ~2 times slower. Changing /bin/sh to dash of course else will now probably cause the headaches that Ubuntu users have experienced leading to proposals to change /bin/sh back to bash: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2225/ -Edward -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple