X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A5185EA.1050802@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:04:42 -0700 From: Ian Kelling User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: fresh 1.7, bash fails with STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION References: <4A51008E DOT 9050205 AT verizon DOT net> <4A515F2D DOT 1060907 AT byu DOT net> <4A5162B0 DOT 4010409 AT verizon DOT net> <20090706025226 DOT GA3985 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20090706025226.GA3985@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > It sounds like you are conflating a serious STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION which > is known to occur on Windows 7 with your not-so-serious "Bash > initialization w/cygwin-1.7". not-so-serious? Cygwin 1.7 install is very broken because of this bug. Seems serious to me. Is anyone able to install a fresh 1.7 with the default settings and not have bash fail? If so, perhaps post cygcheck to compare? - Ian Kelling -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple